Legal Opinion

Scerrino v. Dunlap

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 30, 1957No. Gen. 46,936PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE FRIEND

delivered the opinion of the court. This is a consolidated suit by four plaintiffs for personal injuries which resulted when the parties were struck by an automobile driven by defendant. The jury returned answers in response to special interrogatories that neither the defendant nor the plaintiffs were guilty of wanton and wilful misconduct which proximately caused the accident, and that the defendant, together with all the plaintiffs, was guilty of negligence which proximately contributed to cause the occurrence. Along with the interrogatories, the jury returned separate verdicts…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Wolczek v. Public Service Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Reivitz v. Chicago Rapid Transit Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Baker v. ThompsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1949
  4. Loucks v. PierceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1950
  5. Alexander v. SullivanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1948

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brennan v. LeshynAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  2. Houck v. MartinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. George I. v. Petroleum Heat & Power Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1963
  4. Jackson v. Illinois Central Gulf RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  5. Bebb v. Yellow Cab Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API