Legal Opinion

Ponke v. Rusinowski

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1928No. Docket No. 13PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

• A careful reading of this record satisfies us that the decree from which plaintiffs have appealed was more considerate of them than the record justifies. As defendants have not appealed, it can not be modified in their favor. The parties are all Polish people. Plaintiffs are husband and wife, and likewise are defendants. Plaintiffs had an equity in their home in Hamtramck. Defendants had practically completed a new house on Conley in what is spoken of as North Detroit. Plaintiffs desired a larger house and employed a Polish real estate agent to assist them. With their agent they visited the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Faigenbaum v. Oakland Medical CenterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Oliver v. OliverMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API