Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Croker v. Chillingworth

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided August 2, 1932Published

1DissentEllis, J.

(Dissenting).—The entry appearing in the Circuit Court Minutes was not a judgment. It contained none of the elements of a judgment. In a very broad and loose sense the word judgment may include the order or rule entered in the minutes, it nevertheless did not dispose of the merits of the ease hut merely directed a step in the proceedings under the provisions of Section 4736 C. G. L., 1927. It was not a determination by the Court upon the issue presented by the pleadings, nor did it ascertain and absolutely fix finally the rights of the parties in relation to the subject-matter in litigation,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barnes v. BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Whitaker v. WrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  3. Penniman v. . DanielSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  4. Ex parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  5. Spiker v. HesterSupreme Court of Florida · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API