Legal Opinion · Dissent
Luning v. Wise
California Supreme Court
Decided December 29, 1883Published
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts appear in the opinion of the court, and in the dissenting opinion of Mb. Justice Thornton.
1DissentThornton, J.
— I respectfully dissent from the judgment of the court in this case.
The decision of the court beloAV in this case is as folloAVS: —
“First. That on the 24th day of March, 1879, EdAvard W. Jones and Thomas H. Holt executed and delivered to the defendant their promissory note, Avhich is set forth in the complaint; and that on said day defendant, for a valuable consideration, indorsed and delÍArered said note to plaintiff, who ever since then has been and is noAV the legal holder and OAvner thereof.
“ Second. That no part of said note of of the interest thereon has been paid.
“That on the 23d day…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Taylor v. SnyderNew York Supreme Court · 1846
- Anderson v. DrakeNew York Supreme Court · 1817
- Ricketts v. PendletonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1859
- Packard v. LyonThe Superior Court of New York City · 1855
- Gilmore v. SpiesNew York Supreme Court · 1847
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.