Maddox v. State

BLACKBURN, Presiding Judge.

Following his conviction of financial transaction card theft and the denial of his motion for new trial, Darrell Maddox appeals, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. Finding the evidence sufficient under the standard of Jackson v. Virginia1 we affirm.

On appeal from a criminal conviction, the evidence must be construed in a light most favorable to the verdict, and *611[Maddox] no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence. An appellate court determines only the legal sufficiency of the evidence adduced below and does not weigh the evidence…