Chutuk v. Southern California Gas Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
After further consideration of this appeal, we are of the opinion that the District Court of Appeal arrived at the correct conclusion in its decision of the case. At the time, the petition for a transfer was before us, we were somewhat impressed by the statement of petitioner that the service pipe and riser were on the land of the plaintiffs and, therefore, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur might not apply. There is some conflict in the evidence as to the correct location of said pipe-line and riser. But conceding that they were located on plaintiffs’ land, still they belonged to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Judson v. Giant Powder Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Willard v. Valley Gas & Fuel Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Phoenix Assurance Co. v. Texas Holding Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- Smith v. Southern Counties Gas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- Willard v. Valley Gas & Fuel Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
3Cited by10 opinions
- Burr v. Sherwin Williams Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Williams v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Chutuk v. Southern Counties Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Talbert v. OstergaardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Hinds v. WheadonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.