Legal Opinion

Newcomb v. York Ice Machinery Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 9, 1932No. 6268PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Circuit Judge.

Appellee, the York lee Machinery Corporation, brought a suit in equity against appellants, Joe X. Newcomb, as purchaser, and the Crystal lee Company, as transferee of the property, to foreclose a lien retained by a contract of conditional sale and to recover the balance of the purchase price of certain machinery comprising a refrigerating and ice-making plant. Newcomb filed a verified answer denying certain material allegations of the bill and including a plea of set-off and a counterclaim. This answer was adopted by the ice company. Appellee filed a reply to the answer…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Sanford Fork & Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Howard v. Stillwell & Bierce Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Stillwell & Bierce Manufacturing Co. v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Banks v. ManchesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Sanford Fork & Tool Co. v. Howe Brown & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hamilton Gas Co. v. WattersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
  2. Hauser v. WatsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. Baird v. FranklineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  4. Baird v. FranklineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  5. Newcomb v. York Ice Machinery Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API