Carson v. Godwin
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.
Apparently the original suspension order for failure to show financial responsibility for the damage caused by the accident which occurred in Charlotte on February 21, 1965 would not have been entered had the Commissioner known of the insurance coverage. It was the fault of the Petitioner or her insurance agent that fact of coverage was not made known to the Commissioner. Thereafter the subsequent suspensions were entered for mov ing violations committed during the period of suspension. Robinson v. Casualty Co., 260 N.C. 284, 132 S.E. 2d 629.
The Petitioner admitted on direct examination that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Beaver v. ScheidtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- In Re DonnellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Robinson v. United States Casualty CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
3Cited by3 opinions
- Underwood v. HowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. HughesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. AtwoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975