Legal Opinion

Carson v. Godwin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 29, 1967No. 191PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.

Apparently the original suspension order for failure to show financial responsibility for the damage caused by the accident which occurred in Charlotte on February 21, 1965 would not have been entered had the Commissioner known of the insurance coverage. It was the fault of the Petitioner or her insurance agent that fact of coverage was not made known to the Commissioner. Thereafter the subsequent suspensions were entered for mov ing violations committed during the period of suspension. Robinson v. Casualty Co., 260 N.C. 284, 132 S.E. 2d 629.

The Petitioner admitted on direct examination that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beaver v. ScheidtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. In Re DonnellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Robinson v. United States Casualty CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Underwood v. HowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. State v. HughesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  3. State v. AtwoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API