Legal Opinion
Franklin v. Toal
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 26, 2001No. 91,557PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHodges, J.
I. ISSUE
T1 The issue in this case is whether the trial court erred in denying the appellant's Motion for directed Verdict, Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict, and Motion for New Trial.
II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
12 Sarah J. Franklin, plaintiff, filed this medical malpractice suit against Kyle Toal, M.D. and Norman Regional Hospital Authority (the Hospital), a public trust. Finding the Hospital was not a political subdivision as defined by title 51, section 152(8)(d) of the Oklahoma Statutes, the district court granted plaintiff's motion for partial summary adjudication on the issue.
18…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thompson v. Presbyterian Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Flanders v. Crane Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Nealis v. BairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Clifton v. CliftonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Jackson v. Oklahoma Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Computer Publications, Inc. v. WeltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- First National Bank in Durant v. Honey Creek Entertainment Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- GOWENS v. BARSTOWSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- Johnson v. Hillcrest Health Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Jennings v. BadgettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.