Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Douglas

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 13, 1966No. Record 6119, 6120PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFAnson, J.

Plaintiffs, Arthur Lester Douglas and Nellie M. Douglas, each obtained judgments in the amount of $4,500 against Harvey Tim-mons and Floyd Timmons as the result of a collison between the Douglas and Timmons automobiles, and, then' judgments being unsatisfied, brought these separate actions against the defendant, State Farm Mutual Automobile insurance Company, Harvey Timmons’ insurer,, as permitted under the provisions of § 38.1-380, as amended, Code of 1950, 1953 Repl. Vol. By agreement of the parties the motions for judgment were consolidated and heard by the trial judge, sitting without a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harmon v. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1939
  2. Temple v. Virginia Auto Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1943
  3. Mason & Dixon Lines, Inc. v. United States Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1957
  4. Utica Mutual Insurance Company v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PorterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  3. Vermont Mutual Insurance v. EveretteDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
  4. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  5. Dabney v. Augusta Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2011

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API