Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Gault & United States Bobsled & Skeleton Federation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 17, 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

— Per Curiam.

Claiming that they had been effectively denied a fair opportunity to qualify for selection to participate as competitors in the 1992 Winter Olympic Games as members of the four-man bobsled team, respondents Willie Gault, Greg Harrell and Edwin Moses (hereinafter collectively referred to as respondents) filed a grievance pursuant to the bylaws of respondent *882United States Bobsled and Skeleton Federation (hereinafter the Federation). Although a Hearing Panel recommended that an additional final trial be conducted prior to finalizing the 1992 bobsled team, the Federation’s Board of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mercury Bay Boating Club Inc. v. San Diego Yacht ClubNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Nassau Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. v. Facilities Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  3. Pearlman v. PearlmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Hudson River Rafting Co. v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. In re the Arbitration between J.M. Weller Associates, Inc. & CharleboisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Heisler v. GingrasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API