Newell v. St. Louis Bolt & Iron Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. Instructions; what they must contain, and when they will be declared ■erroneous.— Woodruff v. Hough, 1 Otto, 596 ; Hashings v. Railroad Co., 58 Mo. 302; Henschen v. O’Han-non, 56 Mo. 291; Oaldwell v. Stephens et al., 57 Mo. 589; Vaulx v. Campbell, 8 Mo. 224; Neale v. McKinstry, 7 Mo. 128; Blachwell v. Baily, 1 Mo.
Read the full summary
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. Instructions; what they must contain, and when they will be declared ■erroneous.— Woodruff v. Hough, 1 Otto, 596 ; Hashings v. Railroad Co., 58 Mo. 302; Henschen v. O’Han-non, 56 Mo. 291; Oaldwell v. Stephens et al., 57 Mo. 589; Vaulx v. Campbell, 8 Mo. 224; Neale v. McKinstry, 7 Mo. 128; Blachwell v. Baily, 1 Mo. App. 328; Rickey v. Zeppenfeldt, 64 Mo. 277; Miller v. Drake, 62 Mo. 544; Clements v. Moloney, 55 Mo. 353; Williams v. Vanmeter, 8 Mo. 339 ; Rogers v. Me Cune, 19 Mo. 557 ; Loehner v. Insurance Co., 19 Mo. 628; The State v. Taylor, 64 Mo. 358;…
1Opinion of the CourtHayden, J.
The petition in this case contains two counts : The first is to recover $10,005, which, it is averred, was lent to the corporation, by the plaintiff, on June 20, 1874, the loan, on which a payment of $500 for interest is credited, bearing interest, it is alleged, at ten per cent per annum. The second count is to recover for services rendered, as stated, by plaintiff to defendant, as book-keeper, from July 1, 1874, to-April 1, 1875, at $200 a month. The answer, after a general denial, contained matter to the following effect: That in June, 1874, plaintiff agreed to take twenty shares in…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Ewing v. HoblitzelleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
- State ex rel. Monahan v. WaltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879