Legal Opinion

People v. Dillin

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided March 4, 1991PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Peter J. Benitez, J.

Defendant is charged in an information with operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [2], [3]). Defendant previously moved to dismiss the Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (2) charge, arguing that Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1194 requires that a chemical breathalyzer test to determine blood alcohol level must be administered within two hours after arrest for its result to be admissible, and, in this case, the breathalyzer test was administered more than two hours after his arrest. The People argued that,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. ThomasNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. People v. KatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. People v. CraftNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. People v. VerdileAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. VictoryCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1995
  2. People v. MoralesCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1994
  3. People v. AliCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1991
  4. People v. Ellis, New York County Courts2001
  5. People v. CapraellaCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API