Legal Opinion

In Re the Estate of Van Bokkelen

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 13, 1941No. Appeal 1; Appeals 2 and 3PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, J.

This is a proceeding to determine the liability of a surety upon an administrator’s bond.

An administrator de bonis non, one D’Arcy Van Bokkelen, commenced a proceeding for his own accounting. After the hearings had been concluded, but before the order was made settling the account, National Surety Corporation, as surety for Van Bokkelen under a $50,000 bond, filed a petition under section 109 of the Surrogate’s Court Act, asking, as a matter of right, “to be relieved from liability as such surety * * * for the act or omission of such principal, occurring after the date of * * the entry of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Scofield v. . ChurchillNew York Court of Appeals · 1878

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of BergmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. Matter of BrancatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API