Legal Opinion

In Re a Paper-Writing Purporting to Be the Last Will & Testament of Sutterlin

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 1, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.

We concur in the finding of facts appearing in the opinion of the learned vice-ordinary, and shall not take time to repeat them at length. He properly found that testator signed the paper-and declared it to be his will in the presence of one witness, and that that witness then signed as such in presence of deceased; that thereafter, and while deceased and the first witness were still together, the second witness came in, deceased exhibited the paper to him, said it was his will, and asked him to witness it, and he thereupon subscribed the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Remsen v. BrinckerhoffNew York Supreme Court · 1841

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re HaltonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1932
  2. In Re the Estate of WherrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1942
  3. James v. WendehackNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  4. In Re HartungNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  5. In re the Estate of GorrellEssex County Surrogate's Court · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API