HORREIL v. St. Louis Public Service Company
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
COIL, Commissioner.
St. Louis Public Service Company (herein called defendant) has appealed from respondent’s $15,000 judgment for personal injuries.- Defendant contends that the trial court erred: in giving instruction 1; in the admission and exclusion of evidence; in refusing to declare a mistrial because of an allegedly prejudicial statement by plaintiff; and in refusing to strike allegedly prejudicial comments of the ttial court. Defendant also contends that the judgment is grossly excessive. For the reasons stated herein, the judgment should be affirmed.
The evidence was such that a jury…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fortner v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Ukman v. Hoover Motor Express Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- Marczuk v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1946
- Gray v. KurnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
- Trzecki v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1953
3Cited by24 opinions
- Moore v. Ready Mixed Concrete CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Hildreth v. KeyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
- Boehm Ex Rel. v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- White v. BurkeybileSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- Creech v. Riss & CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.