Legal Opinion

Nelson & Cook v. Johnson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1895No. 6016PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from the district court of Burt county. Tried below before Irvine, J.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

This action was commenced by plaintiffs against defendant, in the district court of Burt county, to recover the sum of $-and interest thereon, alleged in the petition' to be the balance due them on an account. The answer pleaded payment. There was a trial and verdict and, after motion for new trial overruled, a judgment for defendant, to reverse which this error proceeding was instituted in this court.

*8A number of the errors complained of in the petition refer to the overruling or sustaining of objections to questions during the introduction of the testimony. These we cannot examine, for the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. DietzNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Scott v. SpencerNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Kelman v. CalhounNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Barton v. McKayNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Glass v. ZutavernNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Freeman v. City of NelighNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HyattNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Macumber v. GillettNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Shaw v. Diers Bros. & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API