Legal Opinion

Farmers Atlantic Bank v. First National Bank of Murfreesboro

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 19, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoNNOR, J.

It is manifest that the defendant, the First National Bank of Murfreesboro, was induced, primarily and chiefly, to enter into the contract with the plaintiff by the agreement of the plaintiff bank, in consideration of the conveyance and transfer to it of all the assets of the defendant bank, that it would pay off and discharge all the liabilities of the said defendant bank and thereby save its stockholders from loss by reason of their individual statutory liability, and also save its directors from loss by reason of personal liability which they may have incurred by violations of provisions…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brick Co. v. . GentrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  2. Edwards Lumber & Land Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Westerman v. Champion Fiber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. Quarries Co. v. . BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. North Carolina Bank & Trust Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Brinson v. Mill Supply Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Corporation Commission v. Stockholders of the Bank of BeulavilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API