Legal Opinion

United States v. Indelicato

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided May 16, 1997No. Criminal No. 94-10129-PBSPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR RETURN OF PROPERTY

(DOCKET ENTRY # 351)

BOWLER, United States Magistrate Judge.

Defendant Michael Indelicato (“defendant”) seeks the return of firearms and ammunition seized by the government on May 7, 1994, inasmuch as the First Circuit vacated his convictions for violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) on October 15, 1996. (Docket Entry #351). In particular, pursuant to Rule 41(e), Fed.R.Crim.P. (“Rule 41(e)”), and 18 U.S.C. § 924(d)(1), defendant moves for the return of the ammunition listed in exhibit A (Docket Entry # 351, Ex. A) and the following four firearms: (1)…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. GiraldoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Daniel GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. Gerald R. CaronCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. Samuel G. RamosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Guzman RiveraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API