Railsback, Mitchell & Co. v. Patton
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to tfie district court for Saunders county. Tried below before Post, J. cited: Gillilan v. Kendall, 26 Neb., 82; Adams v. Banh, 53 la., 491; Jones, Chat. Mtg., sec. 63; Banh v. Delano, 48 N. Y., 326.
1Opinion of the Court
Maxwell, Ch. J.
This is an action of replevin brought by the defendant in error against Edward P. Folsom. The plaintiff in error intervened in the action. On the trial of the cause the jury found the right of property and the right of possession thereof to be in the plaintiff below (defendant in error), and a motion for a new trial having been overruled, judgment was entered on the verdict.
There is but little conflict as to the material facts in the case. In December, 1885, one A. S. Yon Mansfelde recovered a judgment against one George M. Patton, a son of the defendant in error before a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cited by6 opinions
- Whitten v. DabneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Lasby v. BurgessMontana Supreme Court · 1930
- Farmers & Merchants Bank v. AnthonyNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Dring v. MainwaringWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
- Wagner v. SteffinNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.