Legal Opinion
Griffin v. Municipality of Kingston
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 30, 2011No. 11-1768UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POGUE, Judge.
Appellant Daniel Griffin appeals the District Court’s grant of summary judgment. Appellant claims that after he sustained a back injury he was terminated by the Municipality of Kingston and several of its officials (“Appellees”) because of his disability. Appellant alleges violation of his rights to due process and equal protection, his rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), retaliation, wrongful discharge and civil conspiracy. For the reasons discussed below, we will affirm the District Court’s opinion.
I.BACKGROUND 1
Appellant was hired as a Patrolman…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Susan Farrell v. Planters Lifesavers Company Nabisco, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Rauser v. HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Krouse v. American Sterilizer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brown v. TucciDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013