Legal Opinion

Will v. Will

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 22, 1929No. 292Published

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

The sole question involved is whether Henry Will took the property by devise or by purchase. If he took it by devise' it was ancestral property. If he took it by purchase it w,as non-ancestral property.

By the terms of 8575 GC and 8574 GC, in force at the time of the decease of Henry Will, the widow took a life estate in ancestral property and an estate in fee simple in non-ancestral property. We think the principle announced in Haus vs. Vorndren, Admr., 116 Ohio St., 327, is not applicable. In that case the testator made a will by which he provided that his son should have the privilege of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Naus v. VorndranOhio Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API