Legal Opinion

State v. Siepert

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1923PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, C. J.

— Appellants were convicted of the crime of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor. From the judgment and from an order overruling a motion for a new trial this appeal is prosecuted. There is no reporter’s transcript. The case is here for review utpon a bill of exceptions duly settled and allowed by the trial judge.

The important question for determination is whether, in the absence of a reporter’s transcript in lieu of a bill of exceptions, the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict and judgment may be reviewed upon a bill of exceptions from an order overruling a motion for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. LottridgeIdaho Supreme Court · 1916
  2. State v. ColeIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
  3. People v. RoachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  4. People v. EnglishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. ShannonIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State v. SlaterIdaho Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API