Legal Opinion

Crownford China Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 8, 1951No. 55073; protests 139523-K and 139524-K (New York)Published

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The merchandise in the case at bar consists of certain glassware imported from Belgium which was assessed for duty under paragraph 218 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 at the rate of 60 per centum ad valorem as plated or cased glass. It is claimed properly dutiable at only 45 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 218 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the trade agreement with the United Kingdom, T. D. 49753, as “Table and kitchen articles and utensils * *

The pertinent parts of the paragraphs in question are as follows:

Paragraph 218 (d), Tariff Act of 1930:

All…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Koscherak Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
  2. Protests 896559-G of Friedlaender & Co.United States Customs Court · 1942
  3. Protests 896559-G of Friedlaender & Co.United States Customs Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API