Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Skaggs v. Cullipher

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided April 2, 1997No. CA 96-258Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJohn B. Robbins, Chief Judge

While I agree with much of Judge Roafs opinion, and for that reason concur in part, I do not believe that the trial court erred in its finding pertaining to the action filed by-Howard Skaggs in the Miller County Circuit Court. The probate court held that the family-settlement agreement released all claims that the estate and the parties to the agreement could have pursued between themselves arising from the decedent’s death, and that the action filed by Howard Skaggs in the Miller County Circuit Court was in contravention of this family-settlement agreement. The probate court could properly…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. LoganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Giers v. HudsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  3. Jones v. BalentineCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Eddleman v. Estate of FarmerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  5. Wallace v. KingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API