Legal Opinion

Dames v. Dames

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 8, 1963No. 62-298PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Judge.

Joseph Dames seeks, by petition under Rule 3.16, Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F. S.A., a review of a judgment for costs. We conclude that the petition should be dismissed upon the ground that it was not timely filed as required by Rule 3.16(c), supra. This rule provides that a petition to review a cost judgment be filed “within 20 days after the entry of said judgment[Emphasis supplied.]

The record before us discloses that the cost judgment sought to be reviewed was entered on April 26, 1963. A petition for rehearing, allegedly duly filed, was denied on June 27, 1963. The petition…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chatlos v. City of HallandaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1968
  2. Craft v. ClarembeauxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  3. City of Hallandale v. ChatlosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API