Comar v. Department of Labor & Industries
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGeraghty, J.
The respondent sustained a minor injury while engaged in unloading crushed rock from a barge on Hood Canal. His claim for compensation was denied by the department of labor and industries, upon the ground that the injury was sustained while he was engaged in an off-shore occupation, not under the protection of the state workmen’s compensation act. On appeal to the superior court, the department was reversed, and judgment entered directing the department to pay the respondent the sum of one hundred forty dollars, with costs. The trial court found:
“That said plaintiff was employed on the shore,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- State Industrial Comm'n of NY v. Nordenholt Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Nogueira v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- T. Smith & Son, Inc. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Garrisey v. Westshore Marina AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- Davis v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Rohlfs v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1937