Legal Opinion

Hallowell Savings Institution v. Titcomb

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 19, 1901PublishedCited by 6 opinions

On Report. Bill of interpleader to determine the ownership of a savings bank deposit. The facts were agreed and are stated in the opiniom

1Opinion of the CourtSavage, J.

Bill of interpleader to determine ownership of deposit in the plaintiff bank. I’t is claimed by Lendall Titeomb, Esq., as executor of the last will of' J osepli J. Bowman, and by Martin T. V. Bowman, a brother of Joseph. It is not in dispute that the deposit was originally made by Joseph, and in his own name. That being so, it should now come into the hands of his executor for administratation, unless in some way ,Joseph J. Bowman was devested of his title in his lifetime. Martin T. Y. Bowman sets up a gift inter vivos, subject to a parol trust, for the benefit of his children, from Joseph to…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harris Banking Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  2. First National Bank v. ConnollyOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Collins v. Collins' AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  4. First National Bank v. ConnollyOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Wallace v. WatsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API