Legal Opinion
United States v. Jane Nadia Jimenez
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 16, 1979No. 78-1948PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PELL, Circuit Judge.
This 'is an appeal by the Government 1 from a pretrial order of the district court suppressing testimonial evidence in a case in which the defendant is charged with unlawful possession with intent to distribute 1,109.49 grams of a substance containing heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The suppressed evidence consisted of a statement made by the defendant shortly after she exited from her car after being stopped by police officers. The statement was made in response to a question by a Government agent and without the benefit of Miranda warnings. The legality of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Beckwith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. Leonard David GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Burley Clifton Harryman v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Terry Gene CarterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. WallraffCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Robert F. Collins and John H. RossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.