Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Hydro Tech Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 10, 2002No. 98-04171; A111078PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

SAIF attempted to reduce claimant’s benefits for temporary disability and to obtain authorization for an offset of previously paid benefits. Claimant successfully defended against those assertions at hearing. He seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board holding that he is not entitled to an insurer-paid attorney fee under ORS 656.382(2). We agree with the board that claimant is not entitled to attorney fees for services provided at hearing and affirm.

Claimant compensably injured his back while working for Hydro Tech Inc., SAIF’s insured. SAIF timely began paying benefits for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Forney v. Western States PlywoodOregon Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. SAIF Corp. v. TerrienCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API