Legal Opinion

Lemay Building Corp. v. Director of Revenue

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 20, 1994No. 76731PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Judge.

Lemay Building Corporation (Lemay) contests the Administrative Hearing Commission’s decision holding that income received from a mobile home park Lfimay owns in Florida is income earned partly within and partly without Missouri, pursuant to § 143.451, RSMo Supp.1988. Instead, Le-may asserts the income should be treated as earned wholly within Florida and wholly without Missouri. Because Lemay took sufficient part in the production of income from the mobile home park, we hold that the *836income was earned partly within and partly without Missouri. The decision of the Administrative…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Exxon Corp. v. Department of Revenue of Wis.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. ASARCO Inc. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. City of Chesterfield v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  4. House of Lloyd, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  5. State Income Tax v. Kansas City Star Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tate v. Department of Social ServicesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Thatcher v. Trans World AirlinesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Maxland Development Corp. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API