Legal Opinion

Szappan v. Meder

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided April 26, 2022No. 1:18-cv-12244Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION MATTHEW SZAPPAN, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:18-cv-12244 v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington United States District Judge TROY MEDER and KEITH SHIELDS, Defendants. ______________________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE This matter is before this Court upon Plaintiff’s motion in limine to exclude 11 categories or items of Defendants’ expected evidence from the trial tomorrow. See ECF No. 58. As explained hereafter, Plaintiff’s Motion will be granted in part and denied…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Alan Baynes v. Brandon ClelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  4. Willard Rushing and Patricia Rushing v. Kansas City Southern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  5. Asplundh Manufacturing Division v. Benton Harbor EngineeringCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API