Legal Opinion

United States v. Continental Chemical & Engineering Supply

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided December 21, 1953No. Civ. No. 865Published

1Opinion of the Court

WIIG, District Judge.

This is a motion by the United States of America, plaintiff for a summary judgment against the defendants.

The action was brought by the Government to recover a claim arising under the Renegotiation Act of 1942, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1191.

Plaintiff’s complaint alleges that proceedings for the renegotiation of defendants’ contracts were instituted pursuant to the Renegotiation Act and that on or about December 10, 1945, the Secretary of War, through the Commander of the Hawaiian Department, issued a unilateral determination that profits made by the defendants…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sampson Motors, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  2. United States v. Raymond Deicer Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1949
  3. United States v. Scandia Mfg. Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API