Legal Opinion

Irvin v. Metropolitan-Hibernia Fire Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 20, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolfe

This was an action of assumpsit brought by the appellees against the .appellant on an oral preliminary contract of insurance. The appellant has assigned, as one ground of error, the refusal of the trial court to sustain appellant’s motion in arrest of the judgment of the lower court for the reason that the declaration does not. state a cause of action, and is therefore insufficient to support the judgment. If the appellant is correct in this contention, further review of the record beyond an examination of the declaration would be unnecessary by this court. Therefore it is deemed advisable to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. SchlinkIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Cottingham v. National Mutual Church InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Sun Ins. Office of London v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  4. Johnson v. BurnsideSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Mizzell v. . RuffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad v. Continental Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  2. MacDonald v. Milwaukee Mechanics' Ins.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API