Burbridge v. Bradley Lumber Co. of Arkansas
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1ConcurrenceEd. F. McFaddin, Justice
I agree with the opinion in case No. 8606; and concur in the result reached in case No. 8607. I cannot agree with some of the statements contained in the majority opinion in case No. 8607, which statements I regard as erroneous dicta; and the purpose of this concurrence is to register my views in that regard.
In the latter portion of the opinion there is a paragraph beginning with these italicized words, “The Description, Frl. SEy± R.B.R.” -, and later there is another paragraph beginning with these italicized words, “Area Involved and Acreage Mentioned in Deed.” My concurrence has reference…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Boynton v. AshabrannerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Brinkley v. HalliburtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- Halliburton v. BrinkleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
- Simms v. RolfeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- Toler v. Fischer and HolmesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941