Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Burbridge v. Bradley Lumber Co. of Arkansas

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 22, 1948No. Nos. 4-8606, 4-8607 (consolidated)Published

1ConcurrenceEd. F. McFaddin, Justice

I agree with the opinion in case No. 8606; and concur in the result reached in case No. 8607. I cannot agree with some of the statements contained in the majority opinion in case No. 8607, which statements I regard as erroneous dicta; and the purpose of this concurrence is to register my views in that regard.

In the latter portion of the opinion there is a paragraph beginning with these italicized words, “The Description, Frl. SEy± R.B.R.” -, and later there is another paragraph beginning with these italicized words, “Area Involved and Acreage Mentioned in Deed.” My concurrence has reference…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boynton v. AshabrannerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  2. Brinkley v. HalliburtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  3. Halliburton v. BrinkleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  4. Simms v. RolfeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  5. Toler v. Fischer and HolmesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API