In the Matter of the Worker's Compensation Claim Of: William H. Rogers v. Russell Construction Company, Inc.

, DAVIS, Justice,

[11] William Rogers appeals from a- district court order affirming the Office of Administrative Hearing's (OAH) denial of his claim for worker's compensation benefits, We affirm, © ©

IssUES

[12] Rogers raises two issues relating to the OAH decision, We restate them as follows:

1. Was the hearing exammer’s determ-nation that Rogers failed to prove a com-pensable workplace injury supported by substantial evidence, and if so, was it nonetheless arbitrary and capricious?

2. Was the hearing examiner's determination that Rogers failed to prove that the late filing of his report of…