Legal Opinion
Raymond R. Mouradian v. The John Hancock Companies
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided April 25, 1991No. 90-1993PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
The question presented by this appeal is whether the limitations period applicable to a “hybrid” Section 301 action, filed by the appellant against his former employer and the union that represented him at his former job, is governed by the military-service tolling provision contained in Section 10(b) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 160(b), or by Section 205 of the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act (SSCRA), 50 U.S.C.App. § 525.
The relevant limitations period for hybrid Section 301 actions is six months, a rule obtained by “borrowing” the limitations period found in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hardin v. StraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- West v. ConrailSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tworivers v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Norman Shropshear v. Corporation Counsel of the City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Figueroa-Garay v. Municipality of Rio GrandeDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2005
- Centro Médico Del Turabo, Inc. v. Feliciano De MelecioDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2004
- Gross v. GriffinDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.