Legal Opinion

Watkins v. United States Army

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided October 28, 1982No. C81-1065RPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ROTHSTEIN, District Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. At issue is whether the United States Army may deny reenlistment to plaintiff based on plaintiff’s admitted homosexuality. On May 18, 1982 the court ruled that the Army could not, under its own regulations, validly discharge plaintiff on grounds of homosexuality. 541 F.Supp. 249. The undisputed facts that provided the foundation for that ruling are also controlling here:

On August 27, 1967 plaintiff reported to an Army facility for his preinduction physical…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Watkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sergeant Perry Watkins v. United States ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. Tosco Corp. v. HodelDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1985
  3. Sergeant Perry J. Watkins v. United States ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  4. Sergeant Perry WATKINS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES ARMY, Et Al., Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. Sergeant Perry J. Watkins v. United States ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API