State v. Govea
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Notwithstanding the trial court’s strongly expressed misgivings about the correctness of decisional law which permits police officers, without any articulable suspicion that a person has committed or is about to commit a crime, to engage such person in conversation and request such person’s consent to a search, this is the law by which both this court and the trial court are bound. Art. I, § 12, Fla.Const.; Florida v. Rodriguez, 469 U.S. 1,105 S.Ct. 308, 83 L.Ed.2d 165 (1984); Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491,103 S.Ct. 1319, 75 L.Ed.2d 229 (1983). See also Login v. State, 394 So.2d 183 (Fla. 3d…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Florida v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Login v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- State v. FrostDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Horvitz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. BrownDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- In re Forfeiture of $21,650.00Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1990