Karp v. University of North Carolina
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
The issue dispositive of this appeal is whether it was error to refuse to admit into evidence the defendant’s answers to the interrogatories. We hold that it was error, and remand the case for further proceedings.
Rule 33(b) of the Rules of Civil Procedure in pertinent part provides: “Interrogatories may relate to any matters which can be inquired into under Rule 26(b), and the answers may be used to the extent permitted by the rules of evidence.” Statements of a party to an action, spoken or written, have long been admissible against that party as an admission if it is relevant…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Reynolds Ex Rel. Cannon v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Stone v. . GuionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Pedestrian Walkway FailureCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Craven County v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Leder v. LederCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Melton v. Tindall Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005