Legal Opinion

Lindburgh Williams v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided September 27, 1962No. 16708PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Williams appeals from a robbery conviction on the ground that his confession was received in violation of the Mallory interpretation 1 of Rule 5(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A. There was, according to his counsel, a delay of about 20 minutes in taking him before the nearest available commissioner, during which he confessed.

The record does not show any objection to the admission of the oral confession on a Mallory point or on any other ground. Thus the point was not preserved for presentation on appeal and, under established procedure, it will not be noticed here.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mallory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Clifton C. Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Richard E. Leigh v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  2. Richard E. Leigh v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API