Legal Opinion

Loyd v. Herrington

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 4, 1944No. 14603PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPEER, Justice.

Appellant Ernest Loyd prosecutes this appeal from an adverse judgment against him in favor of F. D. Herrington, who sued to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by the explosion of a dynamite cap, resulting from the negligent acts of Loyd while acting through an agent, servant and employee.

The pleadings are lengthy and we shall content ourselves with a brief statement disclosing the issuable points. We shall later refer to the jury verdict which will reveal the alleged negligence imputed to appellant (Loyd) and his defenses thereto.

The petition, in effect, states: At…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. CurrieTexas Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Smerke v. Office Equipment CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Kampmann v. RothwellTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Cameron Mill & Elevator Co. v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  5. International & Great Northern Railroad v. CooperTexas Supreme Court · 1895

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Loyd v. HerringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Holt v. Texas-New Mexico Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API