Legal Opinion

Marcalus Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 26, 1958No. 14306_1PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant sold paper products in wrappers which bore a maroon oval with the registered name “Marcal” and other words superimposed in the oval in white letters. This case arose when appellant sought to i-egister the maroon oval by itself, without any wording. 1 The Patent Office refused registration, and appellant filed an action in the District Court under 15 U.S.C. § 1071, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1071 and 35 U.S.C. § 145. The District Court dismissed the complaint, concluding that the various maroon ovals by themselves were not in fact distinguishing marks for appellant’s products.

Appellant argues…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Application of Hillerich & Bradsby CoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  2. Hygienic Products Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Stix Products, Inc. v. United Merchants & Manufacturers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  2. Seabrook Foods, Inc. v. Bar-Well Foods Ltd.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  3. Zippo Manufacturing Company v. Rogers Imports, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1963
  4. Miles Laboratories, Inc. v. FrolichDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1961
  5. Wembley, Inc. v. Diplomat Tie CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1963

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API