United States v. Sullivan
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
COX, Judge:
On his pleas, appellant was convicted by Judge Donald E. Weir, sitting as a general court-martial, of one specification each of wrongful distribution of the medication dilaudid, larceny of dilaudid, and two specifications of forging prescriptions for dilaudid, in violation of Articles 112a, 121, and 123, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 912a, 921, and 923, respectively.1 This appeal relates only to the propriety of the sentencing phase of the trial, and we agreed to consider:
WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION IN DENYING A DEFENSE…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. ThomasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. HagenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. MenokenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
- United States v. RiversCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
- United States v. MabeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
- United States v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
- United States v. MahoneyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.