Grays Harbor Boom Co. v. Lownsdale
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Chehalis county, Linn, J., entered October 26, 1908, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendant, awarding damages in condemnation proceedings.
1Opinion
On Petition eoe Rehearing.
[En Banc. October 15, 1909.]
2Per curiam
A petition for a rehearing has been filed in this case, in which it is urgently and earnestly contended that *96respondents’ right to claim the value of their property, considered as a boom site or as valuable for other commercial purposes, is a Federal question, and should be so treated by this court. Respondents are of opinion, that the decision of this court results in a talcing of their property without due process of law; that their property is taken without just compensation, and that they are denied the equal protection of the laws,…
3Cases cited25 opinions
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Transportation Co. v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.