Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Carr

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided September 13, 2002No. 85,238Published

1DissentSix, J.

McKay, 271 Kan. 725, 26 P.3d 58 (2001), and State v. Conley, 270 Kan. 18, 11 P.3d 1147 (2000), cert. denied 532 U.S. 932 (2001). However, I dissent from the majority’s conclusion that Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 147 L. Ed. 2d 435, 120 S. Ct. 2348 (2000), does not apply to upward dispositional departures under K.S.A. 2001 Supp. 21-4716.

After this case was docketed in the Court of Appeals, we held in State v. Gould, 271 Kan. 394, 413, 23 P.3d 801 (2001): “The Kansas scheme for imposing upward departure sentences, embodied in K.S.A. 2000 Supp. 21-4716, is unconstitutional on its face.”…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. State v. GouldSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  3. State v. ConleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  4. State v. GonzalesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API