Legal Opinion

Allan v. Brown & Root, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided June 2, 1980No. Civ. A. H-79-835PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

STERLING, District Judge.

Presently pending before the Court are Defendants’ motions to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b), Fed.R.Civ.P. and on the basis of forum non conveniens. Defendants’ motions are opposed by Plaintiff. Defendants have submitted affidavits in support of their motions to dismiss Plaintiff’s claims. Therefore, the Court will consider the Defendants’ motions to dismiss as motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P. Accordingly, Defendants have the burden of establishing that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that they are…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Lauritzen v. LarsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Alexander Chiazor v. Transworld Drilling Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  2. Jim Fox Enterprises, Inc. v. Air FranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. Thier v. Lykes Bros., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1995
  4. Texaco, Inc. v. AddisonMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  5. John Scott, Inc. v. Munford, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API