Legal Opinion

G. & H. Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. Railroad Commission

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 1, 1940No. 8978PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLAIR, Justice.

Appellants, G. & H. Motor Freight Lines, Inc., Brown Express Company, C. T. English, and Charles Herder, Jr., instituted this statutory proceeding against ap-pellees, the Red Arrow Freight Lines, Inc., and the Railroad Commission, to set aside an order of the Commission authorizing the Red Arrow to operate certain common carrier motor carrier service between Bremond and LaGrange, to cancel the certificate of authority, and to perpetually enjoin the Red Arrow from any operation thereunder. From the adverse judgment of the trial court appellants have appealed.

The following…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BackusSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. MuseTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Hermann v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Georgia Public Service Commission v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. New Process Production Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Alamo Express, Inc. v. Union City TransferTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Texas State Board of Dental Examiners v. Silagi, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1989
  3. Kerrville Bus Co. v. Continental Bus SystemCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  4. Alamo Express, Inc. v. Union City TransferCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Murray v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API