Legal Opinion

Winter v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 9, 2006No. 04SC654PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTINEZ, Justice.

We granted certiorari to determine whether the employee lockers in this case are included within the concept of a “vault” or “other apparatus or equipment under the third degree burglary statute, § 18-4-204(1), C.R.S. (2005); and if included, whether the third degree burglary statute violates due process of law because it is unconstitutionally vague both on its face and as applied. We hold that the lockers in this case are not included within the concept of a “vault” or “other apparatus or equipment.” We do not reach the second issue. Accordingly, we reverse the decision of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. De Gesualdo v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  2. Lakeview Associates, Ltd. v. MaesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  3. Davidson v. SandstromSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  4. Cooper v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  5. People v. NeesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. EspinozaColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. People v. AguilarColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. People v. NerudColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. In Re LudwigUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2006
  5. People v. BeckColorado Court of Appeals · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API