Burgess Battery Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Keefe, Judge:
The merchandise involved here consists of scraps zinc imported from Canada and was classified as “old and worn-out zinc, fit only to be remanufactured” under paragraph 394 of the Tariff' Act of 1930 at 1% cents per pound. The importer claims that the merchandise is entitled to free entry as American goods returned under-the provisions of paragraph 1615, as amended. An agreed statement of fact was entered into as to the merchandise covered by each of the-protests and each of the entries therein. In order to not unduly extend the opinion we quote the stipulation below as filed with…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. BirdCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
- United States v. Tower & SonsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
- United States v. Rubelli's SonsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
- United States v. SaundersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
- South Porto Rico Sugar Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
3Cited by4 opinions
- Precision Specialty Metals, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- Air Carrier Supply Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
- Import-Export Service v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
- Humphreys v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955